Legal Opinion

People's State Bank v. Miller

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1915No. Docket No. 15PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Wayne; Halley, J. Action by People’s State Bank against Guy A. Miller upon a dishonored check. Judgment for defendant on a directed verdict. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.

The defendant, who is a practicing attorney in the city of Detroit, in the year 1908 occasionally bought and sold stock through Cameron Currie & Co., a firm of brokers, whose business methods have been reviewed and passed upon by this court in the recent case of Austin v. Hayden, 171 Mich. 38 (137 N. W. 317). This firm of brokers were customers of the plaintiff bank, and for some years up to the date of their failure maintained with it a general deposit and checking account. On the 10th day of July, 1908, Mr. Miller gave an order to Cameron Currie & Co. to purchase for his account 100 shares…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. National Commercial Bank v. Miller & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  2. In re State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  3. Austin v. HaydenMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Balbach v. FrelinghuysenDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1883
  5. Fayette National Bank v. SummersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1906

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. John Schweyer & Co. v. MellonMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Republic National Bank v. BoboMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Farmers' & Merchants' Bank v. NissenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
  4. First National Bank v. DenfeldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  5. First Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. HeilmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API