Legal Opinion

Miller v. Commercial State Savings Bank

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1924No. Docket No. 99PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

Plaintiffs claim that on January 6, 1921, they were induced by two men named Parrott and Foster, who exhibited purported credentials as representatives of defendant Michigan Guaranty Corporation, to purchase 20 shares of stock of that company at $150 per share and give two notes payable to such company, one for $750 and the other for $2,250. It is their claim that these two men made material false and fraudulent statements, representing to them that they were sent by former Senator Smith, president of the company, and who was favorably known to Mr. Miller; that the stock offered was company…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Smith v. WerkheiserMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Drovers' National Bank v. BlueMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  3. John Schweyer & Co. v. MellonMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Thompson v. Village of MecostaMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Mace v. KennedyMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Matteson v. WeaverMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Pennoyer v. Dubois State BankWyoming Supreme Court · 1926
  3. People's Savings Bank v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  4. Radloff v. Ruggles Motor Truck Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Cartier v. MorrisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API