Legal Opinion

Grenz v. Fire and Cas. of Connecticut

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1996No. 95-471PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erdmann

Samuel J. Grenz appeals from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Court which affirmed the Montana Department of Labor and Industry’s decision that Grenz’s occupational disease claim was barred by the statute of limitations as set forth in § 39-72-403, MCA (1985). We affirm.

The issue on appeal is whether the Workers’ Compensation Court erred in concluding that Grenz’s occupational disease claim, filed in 1992, was barred by the two-year statute of limitations contained in § 39-72-403, MCA (1985).

FACTS

On August 22, 1984, Grenz injured his right elbow while working on a steel railing for his…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lockwood v. W. R. Grace & Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Fandrich v. Capital Ford Lincoln MercuryMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. McIntyre v. Glen Lake Irrigation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Rasmussen v. LeeMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Grenz v. Fire & Casualty of ConnecticutMontana Supreme Court · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Heisler v. Hines Motor Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Total Mechanical Heating & Air Conditioning v. EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS DIVISIONMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Hardgrove v. Transportation InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Fleming v. International Paper Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Montana State Fund v. GrandeMontana Supreme Court · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API