Legal Opinion

Heisler v. Hines Motor Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1997No. 95-485PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hunt

Appellant Michael E. Heisler (Heisler) appeals the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court denying his motion for summary judg*273ment on the issue of whether he was constitutionally entitled to change his treating physician without the prior approval of the State Compensation Insurance Fund (State Fund). We reverse and remand.

ISSUE

The dispositive issue presented on appeal is whether the Workers’ Compensation Court erred in denying Heisler’s motion for summary judgment on the question of whether he was constitutionally entitled to change his treating physician without the prior approval of…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Lyng v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, & Agricultural Implement WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Motarie v. Northern Montana Joint Refuse Disposal DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Alaska Pacific Assurance Co. v. BrownAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Stratemeyer v. Lincoln CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1993

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. In Re the Mental Health of K.G.F.Montana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Havre Daily News, LLC v. City of HavreMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Powell v. State Compensation Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Plouffe v. Montana Department of Public Health & Human ServicesMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Powder River County v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2002

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API