Legal Opinion

Montana State Fund v. Grande

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 2012No. DA 11-0492PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

¶1 The Montana State Fund (MSF) appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court (WCC) concluding that Clarence Grande’s job duties as a truck driver for City Service Valcon (Valcon) are the major contributing cause of his arthritic condition, thus he is suffering from an occupational disease. We affirm.

¶2 MSF raises the following three issues on appeal:

¶3 1. Whether the WCC erred in concluding that Grande is suffering from a compensable occupational disease arising out of and in the course and scope of his employment.

¶4 2. Whether the WCC erred in ordering payment of temporary total…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Eastman v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Ridenour v. Equity Supply Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Hiett v. Missoula County Public SchoolsMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  4. EBI/Orion Group v. BlytheMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  5. EBI/Orion Group v. BlytheMontana Supreme Court · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dvorak v. Montana State FundMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Malcomson v. Liberty NorthwestMontana Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Dvorak v. Montana State FundMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Montana State Fund v. GrandeMontana Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API