Legal Opinion

Harris v. Mayfield

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided April 2, 1924No. Nos. 440-3920PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStayton, J.

In 1901 William Harris and his wife, Clora, owned, as community property, a lot in the city of Marshall. Back taxes were due upon it. The city by suit and judgment foreclosed its- tax lien; and, under a sheriff’s sale and by mesne conveyances and the operation of the statute of descent and distribution, a daughter-in-law of the couple, Lillie Harris, acquired an undivided interest in the property.

After the sheriff’s sale, William and Clora Harris continued to live upon the lot. William died. Clora, shortly before her death, conveyed to Mollie Mayfield an undivided interest in the property.

Moll…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Deaton v. RushTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Erickson v. WiperNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Howard v. NorthTexas Supreme Court · 1849
  4. Stiles v. HawkinsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1918
  5. Phillipson v. FlynnTexas Supreme Court · 1892

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Todd v. BrunerTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Griggs v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  3. Zobel v. SlimTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Buckner Orphans Home v. BerryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  5. Cargill v. BuieCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API