Legal Opinion

Todd v. Bruner

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1963No. A-8674PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORVELL, Justice.

This case presents a cotenancy situation involving the ten year statute of limitation, Article 5510, Vernon’s Ann.Tex. Stats. It is the settled law in this state that, “The possession of a cotenant or tenant in common will be presumed to be in right of the common title. He will not be permitted to claim the protection of the statute of limitations unless it clearly appears that he has repudiated the title of his cotenant and is holding adversely to it.” Phillipson v. Flynn, 83 Tex. 580, 19 S.W. 136; Poenisch v. Quarnstrom, Tex.Sup.Ct., 361 S.W.2d 367.

The facts of this case…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Joske v. IrvineTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Stiles v. HawkinsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1918
  3. Phillipson v. FlynnTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Moore v. KnightTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Sweeten v. ParkTexas Supreme Court · 1955

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. King Ranch, Inc. v. ChapmanTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. BP America Production Co. v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Cass v. Stephens, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2004
  4. Amador v. Berrospe, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1997
  5. Dyer v. Cotton, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API