Legal Opinion
Hubb Diggs Co. v. Bell
Texas Commission of Appeals
Decided January 4, 1928No. 1045-4967PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNickels, J.
The case is fully stated in the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals. 297 S. W. 682. See also (Tex. Com. App.) 293 S. W. 808.
Por instant purposes, it .is sufficient to say: (a) Dangerous and reckless speed made up or was included in negligence charged respectively against the company and the deceased. (b) That negligence as proximate cause of the collision and Bell’s death was charged against the company and the deceased, (c) The jury found the speed of the company’s truck and of Bell’s motorcycle to have been, respectively, 26 and 38 miles per hour, (d) The company’s act was negligent, but…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Barron v. Houston E. & W. T. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1923
- Comanche Duke Oil Co. v. Texas Pac. Coal & Oil Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1927
- Cameron Compress Co. v. WhitingtonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
- Hubb Diggs Co. v. BellTexas Supreme Court · 1927
- City of Fort Worth v. DavidsonTexas Supreme Court · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Brown v. LundellTexas Supreme Court · 1961
- Langner v. CavinessSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
- Kuemmel v. VradenburgCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
- Texaco Inc. v. JoffrionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
- Dallas Ry. & Terminal Co. v. TravisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.