Cameron Compress Co. v. Whitington
Texas Commission of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtNickels, J.
Whitington delivered to the compress company 98 bales of cotton, receiving from the company, for each bale, a receipt (reproduced in extenso in the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals, 268 S. W. 216, 217), which, in substance, declared the company had received the cotton for the purpose of “storage and compression” and that it would redeliver the cotton to the legal holder of the receipt (“or pay the market value thereof”), “loss by act of Providence or fire damage excepted (unless insured by this company)”; it being added that the “company is not a public weigher or warehouse.” Whitington…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. HarriettTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1894
- Houston & T. C. R'y Co. v. CowserTexas Supreme Court · 1881
- G., C. & Santa Fe R'y Co. v. EvansichTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. ComptonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1890
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Honea, by Next Friend v. Coca Cola Bot. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1944
- Comanche Duke Oil Co. v. Texas Pac. Coal & Oil Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1927
- Southwestern Investment Co. v. MannixTexas Supreme Court · 1977
- Silver Falls Timber Co. v. Eastern & Western Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1934
- McMillen Feeds, Inc. of Texas v. HarlowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.