Legal Opinion

Kuemmel v. Vradenburg

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 23, 1951No. 12215PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Justice.. This is an appeal from a judgment on a jury verdict convicting defendant of negligence arising out of a head injury proximately cause by a “hot-rod” racing car which ran into the minor plaintiff, who was a spectator at a car race.

The appeal concerns the following points :(1) Was there any evidence and sufficient evidence to support the jury finding that the defendant was negligent in failing to maintain a barrier of reasonably sufficient strength to protect the spectators?(2) Did the trial court err in sustaining an exception to defendant’s answer and in refusing to submit an…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. City of Dallas v. MaxwellTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  2. Arnold v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  3. G., H. & H. R'y Co. v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Taylor v. WhiteTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
  5. Trinity & B. V. Ry. Co. v. McDonaldTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Rudes v. GottschalkTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Golden Villa Nursing Home, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  3. Motsenbocker v. WyattTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  4. South Austin Drive-In Theatre v. ThomisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  5. KELLEY, ADMR. v. Sportsmen's SpeedwayMississippi Supreme Court · 1955

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API