Legal Opinion

Hubb Diggs Co. v. Bell

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1927No. 4745PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge BISHOP

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.

The Court of Civil Appeals for the Second District certifies the question whether the trial court erred in overruling motion for new trial on objections made to arguments of counsel before the jury on trial of this case. The statement made in the certificate, excluding references to and quotations from authorities contained therein, is:

“In the above entitled cause Mrs. J. D. Bell, surviving wife of J. D. Bell, deceased, recovered a judgment against Hubb Diggs Company for $7,500, as damages resulting from the death…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bell v. BlackwellTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  2. Emberlin v. Wichita Falls, R. & Ft. W. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1926

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Lewis v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. BallewTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  3. West Texas Utilities Co. v. RennerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  4. Texas Indemnity Ins. Co. v. McCurryTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  5. Williams v. RodockerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API