Legal Opinion
Honan v. Dimyan
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 2, 1999No. AC 17121PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
The plaintiffs appeal from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a jury trial, in favor of the defendants. On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the *125trial court improperly (1) denied their motion for permission to file a motion for summary judgment, (2) precluded evidence concerning a collateral case, (3) denied their motion to set aside the verdict as it was against the weight of the evidence, (4) instructed the jury on their claim of invasion of privacy and (5) denied their motion for a new trial, which was based on the purported misconduct of both the trial court…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- DeLaurentis v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Williams Ford, Inc. v. Hartford Courant Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Goodrich v. Waterbury Republican-American, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Mozzochi v. BeckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Murray v. TaylorConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Marshall v. Hartford HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Honan v. DimyanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Holmes v. Town of East LymeDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2012
- Wilson v. JeffersonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.