Furtado v. Bird
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Merced County and from an order refusing a new trial. E. N. Rector, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. F. G. Ostrander, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
Action for personal injury. It is alleged in plaintiff’s complaint:
‘ ‘ II. That on or about the 24th day of October, 1912, plaintiff was traveling along said county highway in a northerly direction, riding horseback; that at said time he was riding on a walk and traveling from the land rented by him and lying south and west of said county road, going to the land upon which he was living; that on said day said defendant was traveling on said road in an automobile driven by himself in the same direction as plaintiff; that at said time said defendant overtook plaintiff who was then riding along…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Jones v. BayleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Eddy v. StoweCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Hontou v. OrvisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Armstrong v. DayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Graves v. Kern County Transportation Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.