Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. Day
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 28, 1930No. Docket No. 6890PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This action was brought by Nellie Armstrong (who will be hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff) and her husband against William C. Day to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by reason of defendant’s negligent operation of an automobile. A jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant has appealed from the judgment entered thereon.
As grounds for reversal it is claimed that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict; that the court erred in allowing an amendment to the complaint during the trial, and in giving and refusing certain instructions.
The…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Reaugh v. Cudahy Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Estate of BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Hancock v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Lawrence v. GoodwillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Isaac & Rebecca Thomas v. GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Memorial Hospital of South Bend, Inc. v. ScottIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
- Jones v. BayleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- People v. MarconiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Garber v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Jeffs v. LaGoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.