Legal Opinion

Sylvis v. Hays

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1932PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

In support of her appeal the plaintiff invokes section 9-224, Oregon Code 1930, which provides that the evidence adduced upon the trial of a cause shall be confined to the material allegations of the pleadings, and cites the cases of Woodward v. Oregon Ry. & Nav. Co., 18 Or. 289 (22 P. 1076), and Martini v. Oregon-Washington R. & Nav. Co., 73 Or. 283 (144 P. 104). We are in complete accord with the holding in these cases. This question has frequently been passed upon by our court. In Kennedy v. Hawkins, 54 Or. 164 (102 P. 733, 25 L. R. A. (N. S.) 606), the rule is stated thus:

“It is always…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Multnomah County v. Willamette Towing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Cederson v. Oregon Navigation Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Woodward v. O. R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Jones v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Kennedy v. HawkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1909

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mezyk v. National Repossessions, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Whisnant v. HollandOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  3. DENHAM ET UX v. CuddebackOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Keadle v. PaddenOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  5. May v. MACKOregon Supreme Court · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API