Legal Opinion

Whisnant v. Holland

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1956PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff, a child of the age of five years, brought suit, by her guardian, against the defendant Prince L. Holland to recover damages for personal injuries received while riding as a passenger in an automobile driven by her father, C. W. Whisnant, which was involved in a collision with the Holland motor vehicle.

The jury returned a verdict for the defendant, and the plaintiff appeals.

The plaintiff assigns error in the trial court arising from the following occurrence:

After the case had been fully submitted to the jury, and that body had retired to the jury room to deliberate, the foreman…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Denton v. ArnsteinOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Multnomah County v. Willamette Towing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Whitehead v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Sullivan v. CarpenterOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Shropshire v. Pickwick StagesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Johnson v. WadeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Miller v. LillardOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. State v. WoodmanOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Dawson v. OlsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Brindle v. McCormick Lumber & Mfg. Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1956

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API