Keadle v. Padden

This is an action for damages claimed to have resulted from the negligence of defendants in taking an impression of the auricle and auditory canal of plaintiff’s right ear.

Plaintiff alleges, in effect, that on March 21, 1930, he was an able-bodied man, with normal sight, hearing and muscular control; and that he was employed and for many years prior thereto, as an able-bodied and skilled aviator; that on that date, defendant, E. H. Padden, was a duly qualified and licensed physician and surgeon, who undertook to make an impression of the auricle and auditory canal of plaintiff’s right ear;…