Banning v. Minidoka Irrigation District
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
TAYLOR, Justice.
Plaintiffs (respondents) brought this action to recover damages for the alleged wrongful death of their sixteen-year-old son, Scott Banning. In their complaint plaintiffs allege that the death resulted from a collision between a train, operated by the defendant (respondent) Union Pacific Railroad Company, and an automobile, driven by one of the defendants (respondents) Arthur, with the permission of the owner, the other defendant Arthur. The collision occurred at a grade crossing in Minidoka county. The Minidoka Irrigation District (appellant) was joined as a defendant and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Power Manufacturing Co. v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Boyer v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1901
- McCarty v. HerrickIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
- Gibbert v. Washington Water Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1911
- Jarvis v. HamiltonIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Taylor v. McNicholsIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
- Pintlar Corp. v. Bunker Ltd. PartnershipIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
- Hayes v. KingstonIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
- Taylor v. McNicholsIdaho Supreme Court · 2010