Legal Opinion

Hayes v. Kingston

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 2004No. 29815PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BURDICK, Justice.

In this permissive appeal, pursuant to I.A.R. 12(e), David O. Kingston appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion to change venue from Ada County, where the plaintiffs allege the fraudulent representations which form the basis of the action took place, to Bonneville County, where the corporation has its principal place of business, some of the defendants reside and, according to Kingston, where the plaintiffs suffered a loss.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

CollabWare Corporation is an Idaho corporation whose principal place of business is Idaho Falls, Bonneville…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Andre v. MorrowIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Sweeney v. OtterIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Christensen Family Trust v. ChristensenIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  4. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP v. Cedar Resources, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  5. Gooding County v. WybengaIdaho Supreme Court · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mendez v. Moonridge Neighborhood Association Inc.District Court, D. Idaho · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API