Legal Opinion
Jaffe v. Vitz
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 12, 1948No. Civ. 16160PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARTLETT, J. pro tem.
This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff for $5,000 on an action brought by him for the breach of the following agreement:
“October 5, 1945
“In consideration of services rendered by Harry Jaffe to the undersigned in connection with the transfer of possession of the Hermoyne Apartments, the subject of Pacific States Savings and Loan Company sales file H-4, the undersigned hereby agrees simultaneously with the execution of the agreement of transfer to pay to the said Harry Jaffe in full for such services the sum of Five Thousand ($5000.00) Dollars.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Evans v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Roy v. SalisburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Rosenfield v. VosperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Smith v. ColemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Ford v. Lou Kum ShuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bixby v. BixbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Ernst & Ernst v. CarlsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Division of Labor Law Enforcement v. GiffordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955