Legal Opinion

Phœnix Mutual Life Insurance v. Holloway

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 29, 1884PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Action on a bond given by the defendants for the faithful discharge by the defendant Holloway of his duties as general agent of the plaintiffs; brought to the Superior Court in Hartford County. Facts found by a committee and case reserved for advice. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLoomis, J.

The bond in suit, which is for $5,000, dated April 25th, 1872, was given to the plaintiffs by Holloway as principal and the other defendants as sureties, conditioned that Holloway (having been appointed general agent of the plaintiffs for the purpose of procuring applications for life insurance and collecting premiums thereon,) should, “ on the first day of each month, pay or hand over all moneys belonging to said company which might at any time be received by him, as also all moneys which he then owed or might thereafter owe the companjq and should faithfully discharge his duties as such…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bixby v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1882
  2. Hayden v. HillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1880

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. McClure v. NorthropSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
  2. Union Mutual Life Insurance v. Murphy (In Re Murphy)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1981
  3. Jacobson v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  4. King v. RaleighMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903
  5. L. A. Walden & Co. v. Consolidated UnderwritersMichigan Supreme Court · 1946

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API