Legal Opinion

L. A. Walden & Co. v. Consolidated Underwriters

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1946No. Docket No. 55, Calendar No. 43,403PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, J.

This suit was brought by plaintiffs to recover commissions claimed to be due them for acting as agents for the defendants in selling compensation insurance. The defendants denied liability and gave notice of set-off and recoupment. The amounts involved are stipulated. Plaintiffs claim they are entitled to a judgment for $2,473.28 plus interest, against T. EL Mastin & Company, a copartnership, Consolidated Underwriters and Underwriters Exchange. The trial judge, hearing the case without a jury, entered a judgment against L. A. Walden individually of no cause for action as to all defendants ;…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brady v. North Western InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Montgomery v. Central National Bank & Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Aurora Fire & Marine Insurance v. KranichMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Stevenson v. Brotherhoods Mutual BenefitMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Ladies of the Modern Maccabees v. Illinois Surety Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Helena Agri-Enterprises, LLC v. Great Lakes Grain, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
  2. Kline v. KlineMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Williams v. American Title InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Soloman v. Western Hills Development Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Om-El Export Co., Inc. v. NEWCORMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API