Jacobson v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the district court for Ramsey county, entered in pursuance of an order for judgment by Kerr, J.
1Opinion of the Court
START, C. J.2
On February 3, 1880, the plaintiff and defendant entered into a contract, whereby the plaintiff was appointed general agent of the defendant, under the instructions of its officers, for the state of Minnesota, during the pleasure of its directors for the time being, in the business of soliciting and procuring applications for life insurance, delivering policies written thereon, collecting the premiums therefor, and for renewal receipts and permits; also in appointing, supervising and controlling solicitors and sub-agents for procuring insurance, and in the general management of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Phœnix Mutual Life Insurance v. HollowaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1884
- Stagg v. Insurance CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Hale v. Brooklyn Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. . ChoateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Chase v. New York Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Baker v. Missouri National Life Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963
- Locher v. New York Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1919
- Barr v. Sun Life Assurance Co. of CanadaSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.