Legal Opinion

Marshall v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 28, 1964No. 37167PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is murder; the punishment, life.

Appellant’s prior conviction for this offense was reversed because of the admission of hearsay testimony. Marshall v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 366 S.W.2d 572.

Though much more voluminous than at the former trial, the record reflects substam-tially the same evidence as was summarized in our prior opinion. Since appellant’s able counsel did not in the prior appeal and does not here question the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction, the facts will not be set forth again.

In his brief appellant urges the following bills of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. NelsonTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Porter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
  3. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  4. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
  5. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Corbett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  2. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  3. Thrash v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  4. Trostle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. Ringer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API