Trostle v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TOM G. DAVIS, Judge.
Appeal is taken from a conviction for murder. After the jury found appellant guilty, the court assessed punishment at fifty years.
In his first ground of error, appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction. The State relied on circumstantial evidence.
Peter Dzwonczyk testified that he and his wife went to the home of the deceased, Fannie Kimball, at 5:30 p. m. on October 26, 1976. He stated that the deceased ran a boarding house on Austin St. in Houston. The deceased, seventy-three years old at the time of her death, had five tenants…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Cumbie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Bates v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Chambers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Porter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Selvage v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Liveoak v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1986
- Miller v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
- Prince v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.