Legal Opinion
O'Donovan v. CashCall, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided November 15, 2011No. C 08-03174 MEJPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION
MARIA-ELENA JAMES, United States Chief Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs Krista O’Donovan, Eduardo De La Torre, and Lori Saysourivong’s (collectively “Plaintiffs”) Motion for Class Certification. Dkt. No. 60. After carefully considering the parties’ arguments, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Plaintiffs’ Motion, as set forth below.
II. BACKGROUND
A. Factual Background
The following factual allegations are taken from Plaintiffs’ Fourth Amended Class Action Complaint…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Schuchardt v. Law Office of ClarkDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Herskowitz v. Apple, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Gold v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Daye v. Community Financial Service Centers, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2016
- de la Torre v. CashCall, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.