Legal Opinion
Schuchardt v. Law Office of Clark
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 28, 2016No. Case No. 15-cv-01329-JSCPublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY, United States Magistrate Judge
Plaintiffs Daniel Schuehardt (“Schuchardt”) and Michelle Muggli (“Muggli,” and together, “Plaintiffs”) bring this pre-certification class action on behalf of themselves and a putative class of consumers against Defendant Law Office of Rory Clark, A Professional Law Corporation (“Defendant”), alleging violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692, and corresponding sections of the Rosenthal Fair Debt…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Staton v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Camacho v. Bridgeport Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- In Re Bluetooth Headset Products LiabilityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Knapp v. Art.com, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Low v. Trump University, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2017
- Acosta v. Patenaude & FelixDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
- Angela Arthur, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated v. Oregon Community Credit UnionDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2026
- Baird v. BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A.District Court, N.D. California · 2021
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.