Legal Opinion

Kukulka v. Millard Fillmore Suburban Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 14, 1984PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: Plaintiff delivered a summons and complaint to the Erie County Sheriff pursuant to CPLR 203 (subd [b], par 5) two days before the Statute of Limitations was to run. The Sheriff served the summons and complaint upon defendant’s former employer within the 60-day extension period. Defendant, however, was never personally served. Thereafter, defendant interposed an answer generally denying the allegations of plaintiff’s complaint. Defendant subsequently claimed in an amended answer that the action was time…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Keary v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Wahrhaftig v. Space Design Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  3. DeAngelis v. FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Urena v. NYNEX, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Air Tite Manufacturing, Inc. v. Acropolis AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Sinacore v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1998
  4. Naccarato v. KotAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  5. Harris v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API