Legal Opinion
Sinacore v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided January 12, 1998No. Claim No. 95937PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
James P. King, J.
Motion by claimant for permission to file an untimely claim pursuant to section 10 (6) of the Court of Claims Act.
Claimant has already commenced an action based on the same transactions and occurrences that are set forth in the proposed claim which he seeks permission to late file. This motion is being brought in an effort to “cure” the defect of untimeliness that was asserted, albeit inartfully, in the State’s answer.
Claim No. 95937 alleges that the State, through the Department of Correctional Services, committed a number of wrongs in connection with…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Charbonneau v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1990
- Pelnick v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Jones v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Ramirez v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1997
- Fowles v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Firth v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 2000
- Vogel v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 2000
- Miles v. City University of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Adebambo v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1999
- Milner v. New York State Higher Education Services Corp.New York Court of Claims · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.