Legal Opinion
Naccarato v. Kot
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 23, 1986PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff commenced the instant suit by service of a sum*366mons and complaint on, among others, defendant City of Troy (hereinafter the City). The City responded shortly thereafter by service of an answer. Subsequently, some seven months later, the City sought leave to amend its answer to assert the affirmative defense of lack of personal jurisdiction, claiming that plaintiffs service of the summons and complaint by regular mail was not effective to confer in personam jurisdiction upon Supreme Court. Special Term denied the motion and this appeal ensued.
Undeniably, the City did not appropriately…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- A. J. Pegno Construction Corp. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Abrams v. Community Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Kukulka v. Millard Fillmore Suburban HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Solarino v. NobleNew York Supreme Court · 1967
- DeAngelis v. FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- DeFilippis v. PerezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Sinacore v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1998
- Boulay v. Olympic Flame, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Allen v. BlumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Harris v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 2002