Legal Opinion

DeAngelis v. Friedman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 21, 1974PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

This is an action for malpractice. There are no factual disputes. Plaintiffs were involved in an automobile accident in New York State on July 7, 1965. They retained a New Jersey attorney who turned the matter over to N. Joseph Friedman, a New York attorney, in July of 1966. He commenced negotiations in an attempt to bring about a settlement of the matter. The record contains a series of letters between Friedman, the adjusters and the New Jersey attorney pertaining to offers, counteroffers and recommendations. On April 4, 1968 Friedman died without effecting a settlement or commencing…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Reed v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Kukulka v. Millard Fillmore Suburban HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Naccarato v. KotAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. International Business Machines Corp. v. Murphy & O'ConnellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API