Watkins v. Enloe
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Frror from District Court, Le Flore County; Malcolm F. Rosser., Judge. In the matter of the guardianship of Luther Bohanan, a minor. From an order confirming sale and directing issuance of a guardian’s deed to Wade Enloe, F. E. Watkins brings error, and W. A. Welch, Jr., guardian, files cross-petition in error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
SHARP, C.
It is first insisted by the defendant in error Wade Enloe that the plaintiff in error F. E. Watkins was not such a party to the proceedings had in the county court as would entitle him to an appeal from the order of confirmation, directing the issuance of a deed to the said Wade Enloe. Our statutes (Comp. Laws 1909, secs. 5451, •5452) authorized an appeal to the district court from any judgment, decree, or order of the county court against or in *562favor of directing the partition, sale, or conveyance of real property to any party aggrieved, save where the decree or order…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- In re the Estate of PearsonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Adams v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- Andrada v. KelseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- In re Pina's EstateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Lamar v. LamarSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.