Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Pearsons

California Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1893No. 15138PublishedCited by 43 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of Sau Francisco, confirming an executor’s sale of real estate of an estate, and directing conveyances to be made. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

Hiram A. Pearsons died July 7,1889, leaving a last will and testament, bearing date August 9, 1882, which was admitted to probate by the superior court of San Francisco, August 12, 1889, and letters testamentary issued thereon to Elliott J. Moore, who was named therein as its executor. On the 28th of January, 1892, the executor sold at public auction several parcels of land belonging to the estate of his testator, one of which was purchased by the appellant. The executor did not obtain any order of sale from the superior court, *605but made the sales upon the contention that he had authority…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Estate of HinckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Easton v. MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Newton v. . BronsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
  4. Conklin v. Egerton's AdministratorNew York Supreme Court · 1839
  5. Castro v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Sharp v. Tulsa County Election BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  2. In Re Estate of DwyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Kahn v. MatthaiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Fay v. HoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Estate of BradleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API