Legal Opinion

Andrada v. Kelsey

California Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1902No. L.A. No. 1279PublishedCited by 37 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

COOPER, C.

Michel Leonis died in July, 1898, and in December of the same year one Kelsey was appointed administrator of the estate, and letters of administration were duly issued to him. In November, 1901, the administrator duly filed his verified petition for the sale of the real estate of deceased, in which it was alleged that it was necessary to sell the whole thereof to pay the debts, expenses, and charges of administration, and that it would be for the advantage, benefit, and best interests of the estate and those interested therein to sell the whole of the said real estate.

After due…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Estate of DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Crall v. Board of Directors of Poso Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. State ex rel. Lindekugel v. Probate Court of Sibley CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  4. In re Estate of SpriggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Estate of PorterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Security-First National Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Tucker v. LeonardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Stevens v. TorreganoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Monk v. MorganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. Estate of BradleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API