Legal Opinion

Arth Brass & Aluminum Castings, Inc. v. Conrad

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 2004No. 2003-0001PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.

Factual and Procedural Background

{¶ 1} Appellant, Arth Brass & Aluminum Castings, Inc. (“Arth”), is a private employer that participates in the State Insurance Fund for workers’ compensation. Arth is merit-rated and, at all times pertinent, was a part of a group-experience rating program sponsored by the Greater Cleveland Growth Association’s Council of Smaller Enterprises (“COSE”), a trade association of which Arth is a member.

{¶ 2} Arth appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Appeals affirming the dismissal of Arth’s declaratory-judgment action against appellee James Conrad,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burgess v. Eli Lilly & Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State ex rel. Ohio AFL-CIO v. Ohio Bur. of Workers' Comp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State ex rel. Ohio AFL-CIO v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State ex rel. Sysco Food Services of Cleveland, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2000

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. San Allen, Inc. v. BuehrerOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Arth Brass Aluminum Castings, Inc. v. Ryan, 07ap-811 (3-13-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. City of Cleveland v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' Comp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Antoun v. Shelly Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Arth Brass & Aluminum Castings, Inc. v. ConradOhio Supreme Court · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API