Legal Opinion
Antoun v. Shelly Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 16, 2017No. 16 MA 0042 & 16 MA 0042PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGES: Hon. Mary DeGenaro, Hon. Gene Donofrio, Hon. Carol Ann Robb
OPINION
DeGENARO, J.
{¶ 1} Defendants-Appellants, the Shelly Company and the Administrator of the Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation, appeal the trial court judgment granting Plaintiff-Appellee, Ronald Antoun's motion to dismiss without prejudice Antoun's administrative appeal pursuant to Civ. R. 41, without the company's consent. As the Company's and BWC's assigned error is meritorious, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the case remanded for further proceedings.
{¶ 2} While Antoun was working he was involved in a…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Krause v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- State ex rel. Fowler v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Schenkolewski v. Cleveland Metroparks SystemOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Zuljevic v. Midland-Ross Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Antoun v. Shelly Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017