Burgess v. Eli Lilly & Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.
We answer the three questions together by responding that the provision of R.C. 2305.10 regarding the accrual date of a cause of action for DES-related injuries is unconstitutional. A cause of action based upon DES exposure accrues only when the plaintiff has been informed by competent medical authority that she has been injured by DES, or upon the date on which, by the exercise of reasonable diligence, she should have known that she has been so injured.
I
A
In a line of cases including Mominee v. Scherbarth (1986), 28 Ohio St.3d 270, 28 OBR 346, 503 N.E.2d 717, Hardy v. VerMeulen (1987), 32…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gaines v. Preterm-Cleveland, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
- O'Stricker v. Jim Walter Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
- Mominee v. ScherbarthOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Allenius v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 1989
3Cited by58 opinions
- State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Childs v. HausseckerTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Fabrey v. McDonald Village Police DepartmentOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Groch v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2008
- Browning v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1993
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.