Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Sysco Food Services of Cleveland, Inc. v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided September 13, 2000No. 98-1974PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Per curiam
For obvious reasons, payment of compensation to a claimant has never been stayed indefinitely by an employer’s appeal of the award. See R.C. 4123.511(H) and former R.C. 4123.515 and 4123.519. Consequently, employers *613often pay compensation pursuant to orders that are later overturned. An employer’s right to recover this money is unquestioned. 1993, however, saw changes that the commission has applied to radically alter recoupment procedure. That procedure is now at issue.
Former R.C. 4123.515 and 4123.519 previously established the means of recovery. Former R.C. 4123.515 read:
“Payment of an…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gaines v. Preterm-Cleveland, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
- State ex rel. Eaton Corp. v. LancasterOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Burgess v. Eli Lilly & Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993
- Youghiogheny & Ohio Coal Co. v. MayfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- State ex rel. Eaton Corp. v. LancasterOhio Supreme Court · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ferguson v. State (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
- San Allen, Inc. v. BuehrerOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State Ex Rel. Dillard Department Stores v. RyanOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Arth Brass & Aluminum Castings, Inc. v. ConradOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- State Ex Rel. Union Metal v. Indus. Comm., Unpublished Decision (3-1-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.