Legal Opinion

Salcedo v. Artuz

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 2, 2000No. 00 Civ. 0930 SASPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.

Pro se petitioner Dulys Salcedo seeks a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner raises the following seven claims: (1) the trial court’s charge regarding petitioner’s right not to testify violated both his right to remain silent and due process; (2) petitioner’s conviction arose out of a single continuous act and requires imposition of concurrent sentences; (3) petitioner’s conviction for murder in the second degree was improper where the evidence demonstrated that petitioner acted under extreme emotional disturbance; (4)…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Jerry Lee Staley v. Kurt JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  2. Pina v. KuhlmannDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003
  3. Ashby v. SenkowskiDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003
  4. Flores v. KeaneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  5. Pressley v. BennettDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API