Legal Opinion

State v. Edmond

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 20, 1995No. 2-94-344-CRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARR, Justice.

This is a State’s appeal from an order quashing an indictment.

Appellee Tony Edmond was indicted for the offense of official oppression. 1 The indictment included four separate paragraphs which each alleged a different manner and means by which Edmond committed the alleged offense. The trial court granted Edmond’s motion to quash all four paragraphs of the indictment. In three points of error, the State now brings this appeal, which presents the following issues of first impression concerning the sufficiency of an “official oppression” indictment, i.e., whether the trial…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  2. Daniels v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  3. Ferguson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Haecker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. Gorman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. EdmondCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  2. Blevins Asphalt Construction Co. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  3. State v. MaysCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
  4. State v. EdmondCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  5. State v. EdmondCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API