State v. Mays
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RODRIGUEZ, Justice.
In a single indictment, John Mays was charged with illegally soliciting employment for himself and other individuals on two different occasions in violation of the barratry statute.1 The trial court granted Mays’ “Motion to Set Aside Indictment” on the grounds that the indictment failed to specify the manner and means by which Mays allegedly solicited employment. We affirm.
STANDARD OF REVIEW
The State’s burden on appeal from the granting of a motion to quash an indictment is to show abuse of discretion by the trial court. Waldie v. State, 923 S.W.2d 152, 154…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Bynum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- State v. EdmondCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Haecker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Doyle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. RiveraCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001