State v. Edmond

BAIRD, Judge,

concurring in part and dissenting in part on State’s Petition for Discretionary Review.

I concur in the resolution of the first ground for review but dissent to the resolution of the second ground for review.

I

Only the fourth paragraph of the instant indictment is relevant to this opinion. That paragraph alleged that appellee:... did then and there intentionally subject [the victim] to sexual harassment by making unwelcome sexual advances and/or making request for sexual favors, submission to which was expressly and implicitly made a term and condition of the exercise and enjoyment…