Legal Opinion
Alexander v. City and County of Honolulu
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided February 28, 2008No. Civil 06-00595 JMS/KSCPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER: (1) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND (2) DENYING DEFENDANT PACLIB’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On October 28, 2007, Plaintiff Miles Alexander (“Plaintiff”) filed an Amended Complaint against the City and County of Honolulu (“City and County”) and Honolulu Police Department (“HPD”) Officer Lee Paclib (“Paclib”), (collectively “Defendants”), alleging violations of his constitutional rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and pendant state law claims. Before the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dawkins v. City of HonoluluDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2010
- Cadiente v. City and County of HonoluluDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2024
- Hollandsworth v. City and County of HonoluluDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2020
- Spriestersbach v. State of HawaiiDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2022
- Spriestersbach v. State of HawaiiDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.