Legal Opinion
Dawkins v. City of Honolulu
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided December 30, 2010No. Civ. 10-00086 HG-KSCPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU’S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT, WITH LEAVE TO AMEND IN PART
HELEN GILLMOR, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff filed a Complaint alleging violations of his civil rights under the United States Constitution and related state law tort claims. Defendant City and County of Honolulu moves to dismiss the Complaint for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The Motion (Doc. 34) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, with leave to amend in part.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On February 22, 2010, Plaintiff…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hyun Ju Park v. City of HonoluluDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2018
- Ingall v. RabagoDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2020
- Manda v. AlbinDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019