Legal Opinion
Three Crown Ltd. Partnership v. SALOMON BROS. INC.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 19, 1995No. 92 Civ. 3142 (RPP)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ROBERT P. PATTERSON, Jr., District Judge.
Defendants Salomon Brothers, Caxton Corporation, et. al., move pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(b) for summary judgment dismissing the claims of Plaintiff Meadowlands, Inc. and for partial summary judgment limiting Three Crown’s claims for damages. 1 Defendant Salomon Brothers also moves the court in limine to preclude testimony by John J. McConnell, damages expert for Plaintiffs.
BACKGROUND
The Plaintiffs are Three Crown Limited Partnership (“Three Crown”), which engaged in the business of trading in, among other things,…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc. v. Jakks Pacific, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Allard v. Arthur Andersen & Co.(USA)District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Miller v. HolzmannDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Spencer Trask Software & Information Services LLC v. RPost International Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- In Re GreenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.