Legal Opinion

Miller v. Holzmann

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 23, 2008No. Civil Action 95-1231 (RCL)PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge.

Ironically enough, this sordid tale of filthy dealing and dirty money began in the sewers of Cairo. After the Camp David Accords of 1979, the United States saw an opportunity to reward Egypt for its recognition of Israel with funding for public works projects. According to plaintiffs’ evidence, defendants also saw an opportunity: to enrich themselves at U.S. taxpayers’ expense by colluding to secure, and then overcharge on, contracts for these projects.

Nearly twenty years after these underlying events, this multi-defendant 1 con spiracy case…

2Cases cited170 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

165 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Miller v. Bill Harbert International Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. Science Applications International CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  3. United States Ex Rel. Tran v. Computer Sciences Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  4. United States v. Toyobo Co. LtdDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  5. Reed v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API