Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Stowe Mills, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 18, 1969No. 6927SC144PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

DEFENDANT’S APPEAL

At the commencement of the trial, Judge Snepp first considered the defendant’s plea in bar. The defendant contended that, since Pharr was a wholly-owned subsidiary of the defendant, it was conducting the business of the defendant; the plaintiff thereby occupied a position tantamount to an employee of the defendant; under the North Carolina Workmen’s Compensation Act, the only remedy available to such an employee was that provided for pursuant to such act; therefore, this civil action did not lie. After hearing evidence on> this question, Judge Snepp entered an order finding…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McWilliams v. ParhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Fields v. . OgburnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  3. R. C. H. Covington Co. v. Masonic Temple Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  4. Robinson v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. Hudson v. Singleton Silk Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Boggs v. Blue Diamond Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
  2. Woodling v. Garrett Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  3. Manor v. Nestle Food Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. O'BRIEN v. Grumman Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979
  5. Gregory v. Garrett Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API