Legal Opinion

Manor v. Nestle Food Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1997No. 63133-6PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

932 P.2d 628 (1997)

131 Wash.2d 439

Paul E. MANOR and Lynette Manor, husband and wife, Respondents,

v.

NESTLE FOOD COMPANY, Petitioner.

No. 63133-6.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued March 6, 1996.

Decided March 13, 1997.

Rolland, O'Malley, Williams & Wyckoff, Wayne L. Williams, Olympia, for petitioner.

John H. McKean, Moses Lake, for respondent.

Craig A. Staples, Vancouver, for Amicus Curiae on Behalf of Washington Self-Insurers Ass'n.

TALMADGE, Justice.

Nestle Food Company (Nestle), a self-insured employer, paid more than $455,000 in medical and time-loss benefits to Paul Manor for a…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Chrysler Corp. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. State v. CoriaWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Marley v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Seattle-First National Bank v. Shoreline Concrete Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Skagit Surveyors v. FRIENDS OF SKAGITWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Skagit Surveyors & Engineers, LLC v. Friends of Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. CroninWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Wingert v. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Wingert v. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2002

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API