Hudson v. Singleton Silk Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtJELoke, J.
In the absence of an express covenant to repair or keep in repair, a landlord is not ordinarily held liable for personal injuries to the tenant or his family by reason of defective conditions of the premises. And even with a covenant to repair, the general rule is that such a liability will not usually be imputed. And it is not required to discuss or determine whether an action of this kind will lie against the landlord under exceptional covenants or circumstances, for if this be conceded, on careful perusal of the record we are of opinion that in the instant case there are no facts in…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Godfrey v. . Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Phillips v. Stowe Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
- Tucker v. Park Yarn Mill Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Godfrey v. Western Carolina Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Robinson v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.