Legal Opinion

Joseph Martinak v. R. James Nicholson

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided August 23, 2007No. 05-1195PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANCE, Judge:

The appellant, Joseph Martinak, appeals a January 7, 2005, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) decision. Record (R.) at 1-25. In that decision, the Board denied an initial disability rating higher than 10% for the appellant’s service-connected bilateral tinnitus. The Board also denied a compensable disability rating for the appellant’s service-connected chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD) and bilateral hearing loss. The appellant has withdrawn his appeal of his bilateral tinnitus claim in light of Smith v. Nicholson, 451 F.3d 1344 (Fed.Cir.2006). The Court will,…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Vazquez-Flores v. ShinsekiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  2. Doucette v. ShulkinUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2017
  3. Marvin O. Johnson v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2013
  4. Lillie M. Wingard v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2013
  5. 06-00 515Board of Veterans' Appeals · 2011

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API